![]() Authorities estimated the piracy cost Nintendo upward of $65 million over nearly a decade and even compelled the company to spend resources releasing a more secure model of the Switch. The group sold tech that circumvented copyright protections and enabled the Nintendo Switch and other systems to play pirated games. government cybercrime charges over his role as a top member of Team Xecuter. Bowser, a Canadian national, pled guilty last year to U.S. 10 sentencing of Gary Bowser provides rare insight, directly from Nintendo, about the company's grievances. Axios reports: A newly released transcript of the Feb. Nintendo described the sentencing of a hacker earlier this year as a " unique opportunity" to send a message to all gamers about video game piracy. In our QN95B review we found no evidence of the TV surpassing 1300 nits with real content. This is possible because the power supply can send short bursts into the miniLED backlight - these cannot be sustained without damaging the panel. QN95B not only changes its color and luminance tracking during measurements to appear very accurate, it also boosts peak brightness momentarily by up to 80%, from approx. FlatpanelsHD has since identified and documented the issue on Samsung's QN95B 'Neo QLED' LCD TV where it gets even worse. Vincent Teoh of HDTVTest first identified and documented the issue on Samsung's S95B QD-OLED TV. This is deliberate cheating, an orchestrated effort to mislead reviewers. When using a non-standard window such as 9% (everything else equal), the cheating algorithm can be bypassed so the TV reveals its true colors. Samsung has designed its TVs to recognize this and other commonly used window sizes, after which the TV adjusts its picture output to make measurements appear more accurate than the picture really is. In this window multiple steps from black to white as well as a set of colors are measured. From a report: Reviewers, calibrators and certification bodies typically use a 10% window for HDR testing, which simply means that it takes up 10% of the screen. The company promises to provide software updates to address the situation. Rest assured that we won't be using DDR4-2133 memory in our tests.Samsung has been caught cheating by designing its TVs to recognize and react to test patterns used by reviewers. We'll have to wait for our in-depth review of the Ryzen 7 3800X to properly judge its performance. It's too early to declare the Ryzen 7 3800X as the winner. The Core i9-9900K performs roughly 14.48% and 0.56% faster in the single-core and multi-core tests, respectively. Basically, what this tells us is that Geekbench 4 is sensitive to memory speeds, and the Ryzen 7 3800X's performance is gimped with DDR4-2133 memory. The Core i9-9900K surpasses the Ryzen 7 3800X when it's combined with DDR4-2666 memory, Intel's official supported memory speed. The Ryzen 7 3800X beats the Core i9-9900K by up to 4.95% in multi-core workloads. ![]() The multi-core results, on the other hand, are in AMD's favor. Nevertheless, the Core i9-9900K is still around 1.09% faster here, according to the leaked numbers. With both processors running with DDR4-2133 memory, it seems that AMD is catching up to Intel in single-core performance. With the aim of making this a fair fight, we set out to find a Geekbench 4 entry where the Core i9-9900K is paired with DDR4-2133 memory as well. As third-generation Ryzen parts support DDR4-3200 memory out of the box, running slower memory will limit the chip's performance. One important aspect to note about the Ryzen 7 3800X result is that the test system was using DDR4-2133 memory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |